Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Group Sparse Matrix Optimization for Efficient Quantum State Transformation
arXiv
Authors: Lai Kin Man, Xin Wang
Year
2024
Paper ID
67022
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
110
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Finding ways to transform a quantum state to another is fundamental to quantum information processing. In this paper, we apply the sparse matrix approach to the quantum state transformation problem. In particular, we present a new approach for searching for unitary matrices for quantum state transformation by directly optimizing the objective problem using the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM). Moreover, we consider the use of group sparsity as an alternative sparsity choice in quantum state transformation problems. Our approach incorporates sparsity constraints into quantum state transformation by formulating it as a non-convex problem. It establishes a useful framework for efficiently handling complex quantum systems and achieving precise state transformations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Finding ways to transform a quantum state to another is fundamental to quantum information processing.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.