You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Enhancing the sensitivity of quantum fiber-optical gyroscopes via a non-Gaussian-state probe
arXiv
Authors: Wen-Xun Zhang, Rui Zhang, Yunlan Zuo, Le-Man Kuang
Year
2024
Paper ID
66941
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
206
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We propose a theoretical scheme to enhance the sensitivity of a quantum fiber-optical gyroscope (QFOG) via a non-Gaussian-state probe based on quadrature measurements of the optical field. The non-Gaussian-state probe utilizes the product state comprising a photon-added coherent state (PACS) with photon excitations and a coherent state CS. We study the sensitivity of the QFOG, and find that it can be significantly enhanced through increasing the photon excitations in the PACS probe. We investigate the influence of photon loss on the performance of QFOG and demonstrate that the PACS probe exhibits robust resistance to photon loss. Furthermore, we compare the performance of the QFOG using the PACS probe against two Gaussian-state probes: the CS probe and the squeezed state (SS) probe and indicate that the PACS probe offers a significant advantage in terms of sensitivity, regardless of photon loss, under the constraint condition of the same total number of input photons. Particularly, it is found that the sensitivity of the PACS probe can be three orders of magnitude higher than that of two Gaussian-state probes for certain values of the measured parameter. The capabilities of the non-Gaussian state probe on enhancing the sensitivity and resisting photon loss could have a wide-ranging impact on future high-performance QFOGs.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We propose a theoretical scheme to enhance the sensitivity of a quantum fiber-optical gyroscope (QFOG) via a non-Gaussian-state probe based on quadrature measurements of the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.