Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement accelerates quantum simulation
arXiv
Authors: Qi Zhao, You Zhou, Andrew M. Childs
Year
2024
Paper ID
66933
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
102
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum entanglement is an essential feature of many-body systems that impacts both quantum information processing and fundamental physics. The growth of entanglement is a major challenge for classical simulation methods. In this work, we investigate the relationship between quantum entanglement and quantum simulation, showing that product-formula approximations can perform better for entangled systems. We establish a tighter upper bound for algorithmic error in terms of entanglement entropy and develop an adaptive simulation algorithm incorporating measurement gadgets to estimate the algorithmic error. This shows that entanglement is not only an obstacle to classical simulation, but also a feature that can accelerate quantum algorithms.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum entanglement is an essential feature of many-body systems that impacts both quantum information processing and fundamental physics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.