You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation

Quantum states from normalizing flows

arXiv
Authors: Scott Lawrence, Arlee Shelby, Yukari Yamauchi

Year

2024

Paper ID

66924

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

90

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We introduce an architecture for neural quantum states for many-body quantum-mechanical systems, based on normalizing flows. The use of normalizing flows enables efficient uncorrelated sampling of configurations from the probability distribution defined by the wavefunction, mitigating a major cost of using neural states in simulation. We demonstrate the use of this architecture for both ground-state preparation (for self-interacting particles in a harmonic trap) and real-time evolution (for one-dimensional tunneling). Finally, we detail a procedure for obtaining rigorous estimates of the systematic error when using neural states to approximate quantum evolution.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We introduce an architecture for neural quantum states for many-body quantum-mechanical systems, based on normalizing flows.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #66924 #69978 Distribution Complexity of Elec... #69974 Hierarchical separation of rela... #69964 Bounded-depth spacetime lattice... #69945 Phase Stable Integrated Delay L...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.