Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Quantum information and CP measurement in H → τ^+ τ^- at future lepton colliders
arXiv
Authors: Mohammad Mahdi Altakach, Priyanka Lamba, Fabio Maltoni, Kentarou Mawatari, Kazuki Sakurai
Year
2022
Paper ID
6689
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
160
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We introduce a methodology and investigate the feasibility of measuring quantum properties of tau lepton pairs in the H → τ^+ τ^- decay at future lepton colliders. In particular, observation of entanglement, steerability and violation of Bell inequalities are examined for the ILC and FCC-ee. We find that detecting quantum correlation crucially relies on precise reconstruction of the tau lepton rest frame and a simple kinematics reconstruction does not suffice due to the finite energy resolution of the colliding beams and detectors. To correct for energy mismeasurements, a log-likelihood method is developed that incorporates the information of impact parameters of tau lepton decays. We demonstrate that an accurate measurement of quantum properties is possible with this method. As a by-product, we show that a novel model-independent test of CP violation can be performed and the CP-phase of H ττ interaction can be constrained with an accuracy comparable to dedicated analyses, i.e., up to 7.9circ and 5.4circ at ILC and FCC-ee, respectively.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We introduce a methodology and investigate the feasibility of measuring quantum properties of tau lepton pairs in the H -> τ^+ τ^- decay at future lepton colliders.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.