Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Machine Learning Quantum Simulation

Quixer: A Quantum Transformer Model

arXiv
Authors: Nikhil Khatri, Gabriel Matos, Luuk Coopmans, Stephen Clark

Year

2024

Paper ID

66821

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

133

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Progress in the realisation of reliable large-scale quantum computers has motivated research into the design of quantum machine learning models. We present Quixer: a novel quantum transformer model which utilises the Linear Combination of Unitaries and Quantum Singular Value Transform primitives as building blocks. Quixer operates by preparing a superposition of tokens and applying a trainable non-linear transformation to this mix. We present the first results for a quantum transformer model applied to a practical language modelling task, obtaining results competitive with an equivalent classical baseline. In addition, we include resource estimates for evaluating the model on quantum hardware, and provide an open-source implementation for classical simulation. We conclude by highlighting the generality of Quixer, showing that its parameterised components can be substituted with fixed structures to yield new classes of quantum transformers.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #66821 #67351 Quantum-assisted Rendezvous on ... #67337 Parameterization and optimizabi... #67335 Detecting Errors in a Quantum N... #67330 Multi-qubit quantum state prepa...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.