Quick Navigation

Topics

Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing Quantum Chemistry

Isotope shift measurement of the 423-nm transition in neutral Ca

arXiv
Authors: David Röser, Lukas Möller, Hans Keßler, Simon Stellmer

Year

2024

Paper ID

66698

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

90

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We report on saturated absorption spectroscopy measurements of the \(4s2\) 1S0→(4s4p) 1P1 transition for the four most abundant even-mass isotopes in calcium. By referencing the laser locked to an ultralow expansion cavity and carefully investigating systematic errors, isotope shifts are determined with a precision below 100 kHz, improving previously reported values by a factor of about five. A King plot analysis employing literature values of the 729-nm transition in Ca ions shows excellent linearity. The field and mass shift parameters are determined from King plots with other transitions.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We report on saturated absorption spectroscopy measurements of the (4s^2^1)S0 -> (4s4p) ^1P1 transition for the four most abundant even-mass isotopes in calcium.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #66698 #73043 Challenges in the simulation of... #73007 COSMA: Communication-aware Opti... #72994 A Semiclassical Gaussian Wavepa... #72972 Depth-Efficient Quantum Topolog...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.