Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Foundations
Generating multipartite nonlocality to benchmark quantum computers
arXiv
Authors: Jan Lennart Bönsel, Otfried Gühne, Adán Cabello
Year
2024
Paper ID
66646
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
183
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We show that quantum computers can be used for producing large n-partite nonlocality, thereby providing a method to benchmark them. The main challenges to overcome are as follows: (i) The interaction topology might not allow arbitrary two-qubit gates. (ii) Noise limits the Bell violation. (iii) The number of combinations of local measurements grows exponentially with n. To overcome (i), we point out that graph states that are compatible with the two-qubit connectivity of the computer can be efficiently prepared. To mitigate (ii), we note that for specific graph states, there are n-partite Bell inequalities whose resistance to white noise increases exponentially with n. To address (iii) for any n and any connectivity, we introduce an estimator that relies on random sampling. As a result, we propose a method for producing n-partite Bell nonlocality with unprecedented large n. This allows one, in return, to benchmark nonclassical correlations regardless of the number of qubits or the connectivity. We test our approach by using a simulation for a noisy IBM quantum computer, which predicts n-partite Bell nonlocality for at least n=24 qubits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We show that quantum computers can be used for producing large n-partite nonlocality, thereby providing a method to benchmark them.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.