Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Low-depth Circuit Implementation of Parity Constraints for Quantum Optimization
arXiv
Authors: Josua Unger, Anette Messinger, Benjamin E. Niehoff, Michael Fellner, Wolfgang Lechner
Year
2022
Paper ID
6652
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
117
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a construction for circuits with low gate count and depth, implementing three- and four-body Pauli-Z product operators as they appear in the form of plaquette-shaped constraints in QAOA when using the parity mapping. The circuits can be implemented on any quantum device with nearest-neighbor connectivity on a square-lattice, using only one gate type and one orientation of two-qubit gates at a time. We find an upper bound for the circuit depth which is independent of the system size. The procedure is readily adjustable to hardware-specific restrictions, such as a minimum required spatial distance between simultaneously executed gates, or gates only being simultaneously executable within a subset of all the qubits, for example a single line.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a construction for circuits with low gate count and depth, implementing three- and four-body Pauli-Z product operators as they appear in the form of plaquette-shaped...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.