Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation Quantum Chemistry

Selection rules of linear and nonlinear polarization-selective absorption in optically dressed matter

arXiv
Authors: Michael Feldman, Matan Even Tzur, Oren Cohen

Year

2024

Paper ID

66469

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

75

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Dynamical symmetries of laser-dressed matter determine selection rules that determine its absorption spectrum. We explore selection rules for polarization-sensitive absorption in Floquet matter, using Floquet group theory in synthetic dimensions. We present comprehensive tables of selection rules that polarization-structured light impose on Floquet dark states and Floquet dark bands. Notably, our tables encompass nonlinear absorption, to all nonlinear orders, revealing that different nonlinear orders follow distinct polarization selection rules, potentially leading to polarization-tunable optical filters.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Dynamical symmetries of laser-dressed matter determine selection rules that determine its absorption spectrum.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #66469 #69978 Distribution Complexity of Elec... #69974 Hierarchical separation of rela... #69971 Quantum-enhanced estimation of ... #69966 Schur--Horn bound on field-free...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.