Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Quantum walk informed variational algorithm design
arXiv
Authors: Edric Matwiejew, Jingbo B. Wang
Year
2024
Paper ID
66438
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
160
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a theoretical framework for the analysis of amplitude transfer in Quantum Variational Algorithms (QVAs) for combinatorial optimisation with mixing unitaries defined by vertex-transitive graphs, based on their continuous-time quantum walk (CTQW) representation and the theory of graph automorphism groups. This framework leads to a heuristic for designing efficient problem-specific QVAs. Using this heuristic, we develop novel algorithms for unconstrained and constrained optimisation. We outline their implementation with polynomial gate complexity and simulate their application to the parallel machine scheduling and portfolio rebalancing combinatorial optimisation problems, showing significantly improved convergence over preexisting QVAs. Based on our analysis, we derive metrics for evaluating the suitability of graph structures for specific problem instances, and for establishing bounds on the convergence supported by different graph structures. For mixing unitaries characterised by a CTQW over a Hamming graph on m-tuples of length n, our results indicate that the amplification upper bound increases with problem size like mathcal{O}\(en log m\).
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a theoretical framework for the analysis of amplitude transfer in Quantum Variational Algorithms (QVAs) for combinatorial optimisation with mixing unitaries defined...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.