Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication Related

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Superconducting Qubits

Simon's algorithm in the NISQ cloud

arXiv

Authors: Reece Robertson, Emery Doucet, Ernest Spicer, Sebastian Deffner

Year

2024

Paper ID

66429

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Simon's algorithm was one of the first problems to demonstrate a genuine quantum advantage. The algorithm, however, assumes access to noise-free qubits. In our work we use Simon's algorithm to benchmark the error rates of devices currently available in the "quantum cloud." As a main result we obtain an objective comparison between the different physical platforms made available by IBM and IonQ. Our study highlights the importance of understanding the device architectures and chip topologies when transpiling quantum algorithms onto hardware. For instance, we demonstrate that two-qubit operations on spatially separated qubits on superconducting chips should be avoided.

Why This Paper Matters

This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
Simon's algorithm was one of the first problems to demonstrate a genuine quantum advantage.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:2406.11771 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11771 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11771

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0

Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.