Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Efficient particle-conserving brick-wall quantum circuits
arXiv
Authors: Babatunde M. Ayeni
Year
2024
Paper ID
66404
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
158
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In variational quantum optimization with particle-conserving quantum circuits, it is often difficult to decide a priori which particle-conserving gates and circuit ansatzes would be most efficient for a given problem. This is important especially for noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) processors with limited resources. While this may be challenging to answer in general, deciding which particle-conserving gate would be most efficient is easier within a specified circuit ansatz. In this paper, we show how to construct efficient particle-conserving gates using some practical ideas from symmetric tensor networks. We derive different types of particle-conserving gates, including the generalized one. We numerically test the gates under the framework of brick-wall circuits. We show that the general particle-conserving gate with only four real parameters is generally best. In addition, we present an algorithm to extend brick-wall circuit with two-qubit nearest-neighbouring gates to non-nearest-neighbouring gates. We test and compare the efficiency of the circuits with Heisenberg spin chain with and without next-nearest-neighbouring interactions.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In variational quantum optimization with particle-conserving quantum circuits, it is often difficult to decide a priori which particle-conserving gates and circuit ansatzes...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.