Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Machine Learning
Single-shot quantum machine learning
arXiv
Authors: Erik Recio-Armengol, Jens Eisert, Johannes Jakob Meyer
Year
2024
Paper ID
66322
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
186
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum machine learning aims to improve learning methods through the use of quantum computers. If it is to ever realize its potential, many obstacles need to be overcome. A particularly pressing one arises at the prediction stage because the outputs of quantum learning models are inherently random. This creates an often considerable overhead, as many executions of a quantum learning model have to be aggregated to obtain an actual prediction. In this work, we analyze when quantum learning models can evade this issue and produce predictions in a near-deterministic way - paving the way to single-shot quantum machine learning. We give a rigorous definition of single-shotness in quantum classifiers and show that the degree to which a quantum learning model is near-deterministic is constrained by the distinguishability of the embedded quantum states used in the model. Opening the black box of the embedding, we show that if the embedding is realized by quantum circuits, a certain depth is necessary for single-shotness to be even possible. We conclude by showing that quantum learning models cannot be single-shot in a generic way and trainable at the same time.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.