Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum majority vote
arXiv
Authors: Harry Buhrman, Noah Linden, Laura Mančinska, Ashley Montanaro, Maris Ozols
Year
2022
Paper ID
6632
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
200
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Majority vote is a basic method for amplifying correct outcomes that is widely used in computer science and beyond. While it can amplify the correctness of a quantum device with classical output, the analogous procedure for quantum output is not known. We introduce quantum majority vote as the following task: given a product state |ψ1rangle otimes dots otimes |ψnrangle where each qubit is in one of two orthogonal states |ψrangle or |ψperprangle, output the majority state. We show that an optimal algorithm for this problem achieves worst-case fidelity of 1/2 + Θ\(1/sqrt{n}\). Under the promise that at least 2/3 of the input qubits are in the majority state, the fidelity increases to 1 - Θ(1/n) and approaches 1 as n increases. We also consider the more general problem of computing any symmetric and equivariant Boolean function f: \{0,1\}n → \{0,1\} in an unknown quantum basis, and show that a generalization of our quantum majority vote algorithm is optimal for this task. The optimal parameters for the generalized algorithm and its worst-case fidelity can be determined by a simple linear program of size O(n). The time complexity of the algorithm is O\(n4 log n\) where n is the number of input qubits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Majority vote is a basic method for amplifying correct outcomes that is widely used in computer science and beyond.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.