Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Collective preparation of large quantum registers with high fidelity

arXiv
Authors: Lorenzo Buffoni, Michele Campisi

Year

2024

Paper ID

66160

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

105

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We report on the preparation of a large quantum register of 5612 qubits, with the unprecedented high global fidelity of Fsimeq 0.9956. This was achieved by applying an improved cooperative quantum information erasure (CQIE) protocol [Buffoni, L. and Campisi, M., Quantum 7, 961 (2023)] to a programmable network of superconducting qubits featuring a high connectivity. At variance with the standard method based on the individual reset of each qubit in parallel, here the quantum register is treated as a whole, thus avoiding the well-known orthogonality catastrophe wehereby even an extremely high individual reset fidelity f results in vanishing global fidelities F=fN with growing number N of qubits.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We report on the preparation of a large quantum register of 5612 qubits, with the unprecedented high global fidelity of Fsimeq 0.9956.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #66160 #69536 Quantum Algorithm for Open-Syst... #69533 Enhanced Sensitivity near a Qua... #69598 The classical boundaries of the... #69595 Tantalum as a base material for...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.