You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Percolation renormalization group analysis of confinement in mathbb{Z}2 lattice gauge theories
arXiv
Authors: Gesa Dünnweber, Simon M. Linsel, Annabelle Bohrdt, Fabian Grusdt
Year
2024
Paper ID
66108
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
126
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The analytical study of confinement in lattice gauge theories (LGTs) remains a difficult task to this day. Taking a geometric perspective on confinement, we develop a real-space renormalization group (RG) formalism for mathbb{Z}2 LGTs using percolation probability as a confinement order parameter. The RG flow we analyze is constituted by both the percolation probability and the coupling parameters. We consider a classical mathbb{Z}2 LGT in two dimensions, with matter and thermal fluctuations, and analytically derive the confinement phase diagram. We find good agreement with numerical and exact benchmark results and confirm that a finite matter density enforces confinement at T<infty in the model we consider. Our RG scheme enables future analytical studies of mathbb{Z}2 LGTs with matter and quantum fluctuations and beyond.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The analytical study of confinement in lattice gauge theories (LGTs) remains a difficult task to this day.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.