Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Leapfrogging Sycamore: Harnessing 1432 GPUs for 7times Faster Quantum Random Circuit Sampling
arXiv
Authors: Xian-He Zhao, Han-Sen Zhong, Feng Pan, Zi-Han Chen, Rong Fu, Zhongling Su, Xiaotong Xie, Chaoxing Zhao, Pan Zhang, Wanli Ouyang, Chao-Yang Lu, Jian-Wei Pan, Ming-Cheng Chen
Year
2024
Paper ID
66034
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
155
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Random quantum circuit sampling serves as a benchmark to demonstrate quantum computational advantage. Recent progress in classical algorithms, especially those based on tensor network methods, has significantly reduced the classical simulation time and challenged the claim of the first-generation quantum advantage experiments. However, in terms of generating uncorrelated samples, time-to-solution, and energy consumption, previous classical simulation experiments still underperform the Sycamore processor. Here we report an energy-efficient classical simulation algorithm, using 1432 GPUs to simulate quantum random circuit sampling which generates uncorrelated samples with higher linear cross entropy score and is 7 times faster than Sycamore 53 qubits experiment. We propose a post-processing algorithm to reduce the overall complexity, and integrated state-of-the-art high-performance general-purpose GPU to achieve two orders of lower energy consumption compared to previous works. Our work provides the first unambiguous experimental evidence to refute Sycamore's claim of quantum advantage, and redefines the boundary of quantum computational advantage using random circuit sampling.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Random quantum circuit sampling serves as a benchmark to demonstrate quantum computational advantage.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.