Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
G_q-concurrence and entanglement constraints in multiqubit systems
arXiv
Authors: Hui Li, Ting Gao, Fengli Yan
Year
2024
Paper ID
66026
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
133
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a category of one-parameter bipartite entanglement quantifiers, termed Gq-concurrence (q>1), and show rigorously that they satisfy all the axiomatic conditions of an entanglement measure and can be considered as a generalization of concurrence. In addition, we establish an analytic formula relating Gq-concurrence to concurrence for 1<qleq2 in two-qubit systems. Furthermore, the polygamy relation is presented based on the Gq-concurrence of assistance in multiqubit systems. As far as Gq-concurrence $1<qleq2$ itself is concerned, however, it does not obey the monogamy relation, but we prove that the square of Gq-concurrence does. By means of this monogamy inequality, we construct a set of entanglement indicators that can detect genuinely multiqubit entangled states even when the tangle loses its efficacy.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this paper, we introduce a category of one-parameter bipartite entanglement quantifiers, termed Gq-concurrence (q>1), and show rigorously that they satisfy all the axiomatic...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.