Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

G_q-concurrence and entanglement constraints in multiqubit systems

arXiv
Authors: Hui Li, Ting Gao, Fengli Yan

Year

2024

Paper ID

66026

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

133

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a category of one-parameter bipartite entanglement quantifiers, termed Gq-concurrence (q>1), and show rigorously that they satisfy all the axiomatic conditions of an entanglement measure and can be considered as a generalization of concurrence. In addition, we establish an analytic formula relating Gq-concurrence to concurrence for 1<qleq2 in two-qubit systems. Furthermore, the polygamy relation is presented based on the Gq-concurrence of assistance in multiqubit systems. As far as Gq-concurrence $1<qleq2$ itself is concerned, however, it does not obey the monogamy relation, but we prove that the square of Gq-concurrence does. By means of this monogamy inequality, we construct a set of entanglement indicators that can detect genuinely multiqubit entangled states even when the tangle loses its efficacy.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this paper, we introduce a category of one-parameter bipartite entanglement quantifiers, termed Gq-concurrence (q>1), and show rigorously that they satisfy all the axiomatic...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #66026

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.