Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Influence of a squeezed prewell on tunneling properties and bound states in heterostructures
arXiv
Authors: Yaroslav Zolotaryuk, Alexander V. Zolotaryuk
Year
2024
Paper ID
65910
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
129
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A resonant tunneling effect of an extremely thin potential well on the transmission of charged particles through a planar heterostructure with an arbitrary potential profile is investigated in a squeezing limit as the well width tends to zero. In this limit, the transmission probability through the structure is shown to be blocked for all the parameter values of the well, except a resonance set of Lebesgue measure zero. The peak-to-valley ratio is shown to increase crucially with the squeezing of the well: the thinner is its thickness, the resonant peaks become sharper and localized at isolated points. Contrary, a discrete spectrum of the heterostructure (if any) does exist both on the resonance set and beyond it, however, the squeezing scenario here turns out to be quite interesting and sophisticated.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A resonant tunneling effect of an extremely thin potential well on the transmission of charged particles through a planar heterostructure with an arbitrary potential profile is...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.