Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Foundations

An invertible map between Bell non-local and contextuality scenarios

arXiv
Authors: Victoria J Wright, Máté Farkas

Year

2022

Paper ID

6591

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

91

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We present an invertible map between correlations in any bipartite Bell scenario and behaviours in a family of contextuality scenarios. The map takes local, quantum and non-signalling correlations to non-contextual, quantum and contextual behaviours, respectively. Consequently, we find that the membership problem of the set of quantum contextual behaviours is undecidable, the set cannot be fully realised via finite dimensional quantum systems and is not closed. Finally, we show that neither this set nor its closure is the limit of a sequence of computable supersets, due to the result MIP*=RE.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We present an invertible map between correlations in any bipartite Bell scenario and behaviours in a family of contextuality scenarios.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #6591 #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68426 On the Approximate Non-Determin... #68413 Emergent Operational Entangleme... #68467 Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.