Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
Benchmarking Variational Quantum Eigensolvers for Quantum Chemistry
arXiv
Authors: Jiaqi Hu, Junning Li, Yanling Lin, Hanlin Long, Xu-Sheng Xu, Zhaofeng Su, Wengang Zhang, Yikang Zhu, Man-Hong Yung
Year
2022
Paper ID
6578
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
165
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum chemistry is one of the most promising applications of quantum computers in the near future. For noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, the quantum-classical hybrid framework based on the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) has become the method of choice. In the literature, there are many different variants of VQE, but it is not known which one is optimal for a given molecule. For this purpose, we perform a thorough benchmarking on more than ten different kinds of VQE ansatzes (in systems up to 30 qubits), based on their performance on the energy accuracy, runtime until convergence, and number of parameters. Our results show that the ADAPT ansatz can be used to obtain more accurate energy for small systems (below 14 qubits), but it costs much more computational resources. For larger molecules, UCCSD0 has better performance. However, all the tested ansatzes can hardly reach chemical accuracy at stretched bond lengths. Our results were obtained using MindSpore Quantum, where the codes and the benchmarking toolkit are publicly available at Gitee.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum chemistry is one of the most promising applications of quantum computers in the near future.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.