Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Connecting the Hamiltonian structure to the QAOA performance and energy landscape
arXiv
Authors: Daniel Müssig, Markus Wappler, Steve Lenk, Jörg Lässig
Year
2024
Paper ID
65725
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
159
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum computing holds promise for outperforming classical computing in specialized applications such as optimization. With current Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, only variational quantum algorithms like the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) can be practically run. QAOA is effective for solving Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems by approximating Quantum Annealing via Trotterization. Successful implementation on NISQ devices requires shallow circuits, influenced by the number of variables and the sparsity of the augmented interaction matrix. This paper investigates the necessary sparsity levels for augmented interaction matrices to ensure solvability with QAOA. By analyzing the Max-Cut problem with varying sparsity, we provide insights into how the Hamiltonian density affects the QAOA performance. Our findings highlight that, while denser matrices complicate the energy landscape, the performance of QAOA remains largely unaffected by sparsity variations. This study emphasizes the algorithm's robustness and potential for optimization tasks on near-term quantum devices, suggesting avenues for future research in enhancing QAOA for practical applications.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum computing holds promise for outperforming classical computing in specialized applications such as optimization.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.