!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Multiple-shot labeling of quantum observables
arXiv
Authors: Seyed Arash Ghoreishi, Nidhin Sudarsanan Ragini, Sk Sazim, Mario Ziman
Year
2024
Paper ID
65682
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
135
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum labeling tasks ask one to recover the missing associations between classical outcome labels and the effects forming the POVM. We study labeling in the multiple-shot regime, allowing a finite number of uses of the device and the most general tester-based strategies, including adaptivity. For binary observables, we show that if perfect labeling is impossible in a single shot, then it remains impossible with any finite number of shots. In particular, we derive the formula for minimum-error performance and highlight its "even-odd" behavior. For non-binary observables, we derive the optimal single-shot minimum-error success probability in closed form, and show that entanglement assistance does not improve this optimum. We also provide finite-shot schemes for (perfect or partial) labeling and give illustrative examples, including the qubit trine POVM where the optimal two-shot success probability is computed explicitly.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum labeling tasks ask one to recover the missing associations between classical outcome labels and the effects forming the POVM.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.