Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Leveraging collective effects for thermometry in waveguide quantum electrodynamics

arXiv
Authors: Aleksei Sharafiev, Mathieu Juan, Marco Cattaneo, Gerhard Kirchmair

Year

2024

Paper ID

65654

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

113

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We report a proof-of-principle experiment for a new method of temperature measurements in waveguide quantum electrodynamics (wQED) experiments, allowing one to differentiate between global and local baths. The method takes advantage of collective states of two transmon qubits located in the center of a waveguide. The Hilbert space of such a system forms two separate subspaces (bright and dark) which are coupled differently to external noise sources. Measuring transmission through the waveguide allows one to extract separately the temperatures of the baths responsible for global and local excitations in the system. Such a system would allow for building a new type of primary temperature sensor capable of distinguishing between local and global baths.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We report a proof-of-principle experiment for a new method of temperature measurements in waveguide quantum electrodynamics (wQED) experiments, allowing one to differentiate...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #65654

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.