Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Quantum Query-Space Lower Bounds Using Branching Programs
arXiv
Authors: Debajyoti Bera, Tharrmashastha SAPV
Year
2024
Paper ID
65598
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
171
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Branching programs are quite popular for studying time-space lower bounds. Bera et al. recently introduced the model of generalized quantum branching program aka. GQBP that generalized two earlier models of quantum branching programs. In this work we study a restricted version of GQBP with the motivation of proving bounds on the query-space requirement of quantum-query circuits. We show the first explicit query-space lower bound for our restricted version. We prove that the well-studied ORn decision problem, given a promise that at most one position of an n-sized Boolean array is a 1, satisfies the bound Q2 s = Ω\(n2\), where Q denotes the number of queries and s denotes the width of the GQBP. We then generalize the problem to show that the same bound holds for deciding between two strings with a constant Hamming distance; this gives us query-space lower bounds on problems such as Parity and Majority. Our results produce an alternative proof of the Ω\(sqrt{n}\)-lower bound on the query complexity of any non-constant symmetric Boolean function.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Branching programs are quite popular for studying time-space lower bounds.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.