Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Dressing trapped ions with integrated wires

arXiv
Authors: R. Tyler Sutherland

Year

2024

Paper ID

65444

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

140

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We discuss dressing trapped ions with the near field of a trap integrated wire. Ramping a dressing field on/off adiabatically before/after an operation changes its effective Hamiltonian. The amplitude and detuning of the dressing field act as tunable degrees of freedom we can use to `customize' the properties of any operation. We propose three use cases for this general tool. First, we can generate `artificial' clock states, where we eliminate the (assumed to be small) linear sensitivity of a qubit. Second, we can break the degeneracies that often complicate shelving at low quantization fields\textemdash allowing us to implement operations with linearly polarized microwaves that would, otherwise, require circular polarization. Finally, we can implement laser-free single qubit gates on a set of `target' ions using fields that are separated from the rest of the computer in frequency space.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We discuss dressing trapped ions with the near field of a trap integrated wire.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #65444

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.