Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Error mitigated quantum circuit cutting
arXiv
Authors: Ritajit Majumdar, Christopher J. Wood
Year
2022
Paper ID
6539
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
206
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We investigate an error mitigated tomographic approach to the quantum circuit cutting problem in the presence of gate and measurement noise. We explore two tomography specific error mitigation techniques; readout error mitigated conditional fragment tomography, which uses knowledge of readout errors on all cut and conditional qubit measurements in the tomography reconstruction procedure; and dominant eigenvalue truncation (DEVT), which aims to improve the performance of circuit cutting by performing truncation of the individual conditional tomography fragments used in the reconstruction. We find that the performance of both readout error mitigated tomography and DEVT tomography are comparable for circuit cutting in the presence of symmetric measurement errors. For gate errors our numerical results show that probability estimates for the original circuit obtained using DEVT outperforms general circuit cutting for measurement, depolarization and weakly biased Pauli noise models, but does not improve performance for amplitude damping and coherent errors, and can greatly decrease performance for highly biased Pauli noise. In cases where DEVT was effective, it as also found to improve performance of partial tomographic reconstruction using at least 50% of the full tomographic data with a conditional least-squares tomographic fitter, while linear inversion tomography with or without DEVT mitigation was found to perform poorly with with partial data.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We investigate an error mitigated tomographic approach to the quantum circuit cutting problem in the presence of gate and measurement noise.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.