Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Exact one-particle density matrix for SU(N) fermionic matter-waves in the strong repulsive limit

arXiv
Authors: Andreas Osterloh, Juan Polo, Wayne J. Chetcuti, Luigi Amico

Year

2022

Paper ID

6532

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

120

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We consider a gas of repulsive N-component fermions confined in a ring-shaped potential, subject to an effective magnetic field. For large repulsion strengths, we work out a Bethe ansatz scheme to compute the two-point correlation matrix and then the one-particle density matrix. Our results holds in the mesoscopic regime of finite but sufficiently large number of particles and system size that are not accessible by numerics. We access the momentum distribution of the system and analyse its specific dependence of interaction, magnetic field and number of components N. In the context of cold atoms, the exact computation of the correlation matrix to determine the interference patterns that are produced by releasing cold atoms from ring traps is carried out.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We consider a gas of repulsive N-component fermions confined in a ring-shaped potential, subject to an effective magnetic field.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #6532

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.