Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

A Construction of Quantum Stabilizer Codes from Classical Codes and Butson Hadamard Matrices

arXiv
Authors: Bulent Sarac, Damla Acar

Year

2024

Paper ID

65239

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

137

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this paper, we give a constructive proof to show that if there exist a classical linear code C is a subset of F_q^n of dimension k and a classical linear code D is a subset of F_q^k^m of dimension s, where q is a power of a prime number p, then there exists an [[nm, ks, d]]_q quantum stabilizer code with d determined by C and D by identifying the stabilizer group of the code. In the construction, we use a particular type of Butson Hadamard matrices equivalent to multiple Kronecker products of the Fourier matrix of order p. We also consider the same construction of a quantum code for a general normalized Butson Hadamard matrix and search for a condition for the quantum code to be a stabilizer code.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this paper, we give a constructive proof to show that if there exist a classical linear code C is a subset of F_q^n of dimension k and a classical linear code D is a subset...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #65239

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.