Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Nonreciprocal Quantum Sensing

arXiv
Authors: Dong Xie, Chunling Xu

Year

2024

Paper ID

65160

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

110

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Nonreciprocity can not only generate quantum resources, but also shield noise and reverse interference from driving signals. We investigate the advantages of nonreciprocal coupling in sensing a driving signal. In general, we find that the nonreciprocal coupling performs better than the corresponding reciprocal coupling. And we show that homodyne measurement is the optimal measurement. A single non-reciprocal coupling can increase measurement precision up to 2 times. Using N non-reciprocal couplings in parallel, the measurement precision can be improved by N2 times compared with the corresponding reciprocal coupling. In a non-zero temperature dissipative environment, we demonstrate that the nonreciprocal quantum sensing has better robustness to thermal noise than the reciprocal quantum sensing.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Nonreciprocity can not only generate quantum resources, but also shield noise and reverse interference from driving signals.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #65160 #77849 The pure Yang-Mills field, I: f... #77847 Fabrication of the Au/guaiazule... #77845 Quantum-mechanical model of vis... #77844 Nonequilibrium bosonization of ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.