Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Accelerated Quantum Amplitude Estimation without QFT
arXiv
Authors: Alet Roux, Tomasz Zastawniak
Year
2024
Paper ID
65046
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
117
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We put forward a Quantum Amplitude Estimation algorithm delivering superior performance (lower quantum computational complexity and faster classical computation parts) compared to the approaches available to-date. The algorithm does not relay on the Quantum Fourier Transform and its quantum computational complexity is of order O\(frac{1}{varepsilon}\) in terms of the target accuracy varepsilon>0. The O\(frac{1}{varepsilon}\) bound on quantum computational complexity is also superior compared to those in the earlier approaches due to smaller constants. Moreover, a much tighter bound is obtained by means of computer-assisted estimates for the expected value of quantum computational complexity. The correctness of the algorithm and the O\(frac{1}{varepsilon}\) bound on quantum computational complexity are supported by precise proofs.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We put forward a Quantum Amplitude Estimation algorithm delivering superior performance (lower quantum computational complexity and faster classical computation parts) compared...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.