Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

30 W ultra-stable laser light at 2128 nm for future gravitational-wave observatories

arXiv
Authors: Julian Gurs, Nina Bode, Christian Darsow-Fromm, Henning Vahlbruch, Pascal Gewecke, Sebastian Steinlechner, Benno Willke, Roman Schnabel

Year

2023

Paper ID

6502

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

129

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Thermal noise of the dielectric mirror coatings can limit laser-optical high-precision measurements. Coatings made of amorphous silicon and silicon nitride could provide a remedy for both gravitational-wave detectors and optical clocks. However, the absorption spectra of these materials require laser wavelengths around 2 μm. For GW detectors, ultra-stable laser light of tens or hundreds of watts is needed. Here, we report the production of nearly 30 W of ultra-stable laser light at 2128 nm by frequency conversion of 1064 nm light from a master oscillator power amplifier system. We achieve an external conversion efficiency of 67.5 $pm$ 0.5 % via optical parametric oscillation and a relative power noise in the range of 10-6/sqrt{Hz} at 100 Hz, which is almost as low as that of the input light and underlines the potential of our approach.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Thermal noise of the dielectric mirror coatings can limit laser-optical high-precision measurements.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #6502

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.