Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Impact of Parallel Gating on Gate Fidelities in Linear, Square, and Star Arrays of Noisy Flip-Flop Qubits
arXiv
Authors: Marco De Michielis, Elena Ferraro
Year
2024
Paper ID
64870
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
163
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Successfully implementing a quantum algorithm involves maintaining a low logical error rate by ensuring the validity of the quantum fault-tolerance theorem. The required number of physical qubits arranged in an array depends on the chosen Quantum Error Correction code and the achievable physical qubit error rate. As the qubit count in the array increases, parallel gating - simultaneously manipulating many qubits - becomes a crucial ingredient for successful computation. In this study, small arrays of a type of donor- and quantum dot-based qubits, known as flip-flop qubits, are investigated. Simulation results of gate fidelities in linear, square and star arrays of four flip-flop qubits affected by realistic 1/f noise are presented to study the effect of parallel gating. The impact of two, three and four parallel one-qubit gates, as well as two parallel two-qubit gates, on fidelity is calculated by comparing different array geometries. Our findings can contribute to the optimized manipulation of small flip-flop qubit arrays and the design of larger ones.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Successfully implementing a quantum algorithm involves maintaining a low logical error rate by ensuring the validity of the quantum fault-tolerance theorem.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.