Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Realization of high-fidelity perfect entangler between remote superconducting quantum processors
arXiv
Authors: Juan Song, Shuang Yang, Pei Liu, Hui-Li Zhang, Guang-Ming Xue, Zhen-Yu Mi, Wen-Gang Zhang, Fei Yan, Yi-Rong Jin, Hai-Feng Yu
Year
2024
Paper ID
64860
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
125
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Superconducting qubits, a promising candidate for universal quantum computing, currently face limitations in chip size due to reproducibility, wiring complexity, and packaging modes. Distributed quantum modules offer a viable strategy for constructing larger quantum information processing systems, though universal quantum gate operations between remote qubits have yet to be realized. Here, we demonstrate high-fidelity perfect entanglers between two remote superconducting quantum devices over 30 cm distance, leveraging the standing-wave modes in the coaxial cable connecting them. We achieve cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB) fidelities of \(99.15 pm 0.02\)\% and \(98.04 pm 0.04\)\% for CNOT and CZ gates, respectively, which are more efficient and universal than existing state transfer or feedback-based protocols. This advancement significantly enhances the feasibility of universal distributed quantum information processing, essential for the future development of large-scale quantum systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Superconducting qubits, a promising candidate for universal quantum computing, currently face limitations in chip size due to reproducibility, wiring complexity, and packaging...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.