Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Simulation
Nonlinear response of telecom-wavelength superconducting single-photon detectors
arXiv
Authors: Patrick Mark, Sebastian Gstir, Julian Münzberg, Gregor Weihs, Robert Keil
Year
2024
Paper ID
64834
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
96
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We measure the nonlinearity of a telecom-wavelength superconducting nanowire single-photon detector via incoherent beam combination. At typical photon count rates and detector bias current, the observed relative deviation from a perfectly linear response is in the order of 0.1% when the flux is doubled. This arises from a balance between the counteracting nonlinearities of deadtime-induced detector saturation and of multi-photon detections. The observed behaviour is modelled empirically, which suffices for a correction of measured data. In addition, statistical simulations, taking into account the measured recovery of the detection efficiency, provide insight into possible mechanisms of multi-photon detection.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We measure the nonlinearity of a telecom-wavelength superconducting nanowire single-photon detector via incoherent beam combination.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.