Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Auxiliary-Free Replica Shadows: Efficient Estimation of Multiple Nonlinear Quantum Properties
arXiv
Authors: Qing Liu, Zihao Li, Xiao Yuan, Huangjun Zhu, You Zhou
Year
2024
Paper ID
64821
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
139
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Efficient estimation of nonlinear properties is a significant yet challenging task from quantum information processing to many-body physics. Current methodologies often suffer from an exponential sampling cost or require auxiliary qubits and deep quantum circuits. To address these limitations, we propose an efficient auxiliary-free replica shadow (AFRS) framework, which leverages the power of the joint entangling operation on a few input replicas while integrating the mindset of shadow estimation. We rigorously prove that AFRS can offer exponential improvements in estimation accuracy compared with the conventional shadow method, and facilitate the simultaneous estimation of various nonlinear properties, unlike the destructive swap test. Additionally, we introduce an advanced local-AFRS variant tailored to estimating local observables with constant-depth quantum circuits, significantly simplifying the experimental implementation. Our work paves the way for efficient and practical estimation of nonlinear properties on near-term quantum devices.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Efficient estimation of nonlinear properties is a significant yet challenging task from quantum information processing to many-body physics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.