Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Probing entanglement and testing Bell inequality violation with textrm{e}+textrm{e}- → τ+τ- at Belle II
arXiv
Authors: Karl Ehatäht, Marco Fabbrichesi, Luca Marzola, Christian Veelken
Year
2023
Paper ID
6473
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
134
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a feasibility study to probe quantum entanglement and Belle inequality violation in the process textrm{e}+textrm{e}- → τ+τ- at a center-of-mass energy of sqrt{s} = 10.579 GeV. The sensitivity of the analysis is enhanced by applying a selection on the scattering angle vartheta in the τ+τ- center-of-mass frame. We analyze events in which both τ leptons decay to hadrons, using a combination of decay channels τ- → π-ν_τ, τ- → π-π0ν_τ, and τ- → π-π+π-ν_τ. The spin orientation of the τ leptons in these decays is reconstructed using the polarimeter-vector method. Assuming a dataset of 200 million τ+τ- events and accounting for experimental resolutions, we expect the observation of quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation by the Belle-II experiment will be possible with a significance well in excess of five standard deviations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a feasibility study to probe quantum entanglement and Belle inequality violation in the process textrme^+textrme^- -> τ^+τ^- at a center-of-mass energy of sqrts =...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.