Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning Quantum Chemistry

Validation of an Analysability Model in Hybrid Quantum Software

arXiv
Authors: Díaz-Muñoz Ana, Cruz-Lemus José A., Rodríguez Moisés, Piattini Mario, Baldassarre Maria Teresa

Year

2024

Paper ID

64680

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

133

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In the context of quantum-classical hybrid computing, evaluating analysability, which is the ease of understanding and modifying software, presents significant challenges due to the complexity and novelty of quantum algorithms. Although advances have been made in quantum software development, standard software quality evaluation methods do not fully address the specifics of quantum components, resulting in a gap in the ability to ensure and maintain the quality of hybrid software products. In this registered report proposal, we intend to validate a quality model focused on the analysability of hybrid software through an international collab orative approach involving academic institutions from Italy and Spain through a controlled experiment. This approach allows for a more detailed analysis and validation methodology and establishes a framework for future research and developments in software quality assessment in quantum computing.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #64680 #67340 Ultra-sensitive solid-state org... #67338 Provably Quantum-Secure Microgr... #67337 Parameterization and optimizabi... #67328 Faster and Better Quantum Softw...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.