Quick Navigation

Topics

Photonic Quantum Computing Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing Quantum Foundations

All-optical atomic magnetometry using an elliptically polarized amplitude-modulated light wave

arXiv
Authors: Anton Makarov, Katerina Kozlova, Denis Brazhnikov, Vladislav Vishnyakov, Andrey Goncharov

Year

2024

Paper ID

64621

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

136

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study a resonant interaction of an elliptically polarized light wave with 87Rb vapor D$1$ line exposed to a transverse magnetic field. A 5times5times5 mm3 glass vapor cell is used for the experiments. The wave intensity is modulated at the frequency Ωm. By scanning Ωm near the Larmor frequency ΩL, a magnetic resonance (MR) can be observed as a change in the ellipticity parameter of the wave polarization. This method for observing MR allows to significantly improve the signal-to-noise ratio compared to a classical Bell-Bloom scheme using a circularly polarized wave. The sensitivity of the magnetic field sensor is estimated to be approx 130 fT/surdHz in a 2 kHz bandwidth, confidently competing with widely used Faraday-rotation Bell-Bloom schemes. The results can be used to develop a miniature all-optical magnetic field sensor for medicine and geophysics.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #64621 #67350 Simultaneous quantum identity a... #67327 Towards Relational Quantum Fiel... #67317 An operational distinction betw... #67316 Synthetic high angular momentum...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.