Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication

Topics

Quantum Entropy Information Measures

Lattice-based ring signcryption for consortium blockchain

DOAJ
Authors: Huifang Yu, Zhirui Lv

Year

2023

Paper ID

646

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

94

Citations

9

Abstract

Ring signcryption with no group administrator satisfies the decentralization and blockchain anonymity. In this article, we construct new lattice-based ring signcryption scheme suitable for consortium blockchain (CB-LRSCS), in which the smart contract controls the process of signcryption and unsigncryption to make the system be fair and reliable. CB-LRSCS can protect the user privacy by reducing the connection between blockchain and user information, and it satisfies the reliability in ethereum environment. CB-LRSCS also has the characteristics of high efficiency, anti-quantum, anti-forgery, confidentiality and unconditional anonymity, and it can be applied in the electronic finance system.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Entropy & Information Measures research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Ring signcryption with no group administrator satisfies the decentralization and blockchain anonymity.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in
Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.101602 [2] Publisher http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319157823001568

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #646

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-15 13:31:39

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.