Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Demonstration of magic state power of mathbf{D}\(mathbf{S}3\) anyons with two qudits

arXiv
Authors: Lucy Byles, Ewan Forbes, Jiannis K. Pachos

Year

2024

Paper ID

64524

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

92

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We consider a lattice of d=6 qudits that supports mathbf{D}\(mathbf{S}3\) non-Abelian anyons. We present a method for implementing both braiding and fusion evolutions using only the operators that create and measure anyons, without requiring additional dynamical control. This provides a minimal protocol demonstrating that mathbf{D}\(mathbf{S}3\) anyons can generate magic states, thereby establishing their universality for quantum computation. Furthermore, we show that the entire scheme can be encoded in just two qudits, offering a compact blueprint that is inherently scalable and readily implementable in current quantum platforms.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We consider a lattice of d=6 qudits that supports mathbfD(mathbfS3) non-Abelian anyons.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:2408.03377 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03377 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03377

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #64524

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.