Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

Subsystem CSS codes, a tighter stabilizer-to-CSS mapping, and Goursat's Lemma

arXiv
Authors: Michael Liaofan Liu, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Victor V. Albert

Year

2023

Paper ID

6451

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

168

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The CSS code construction is a powerful framework used to express features of a quantum code in terms of a pair of underlying classical codes. Its subsystem extension allows for similar expressions, but the general case has not been fully explored. Extending previous work of Aly, Klappenecker, and Sarvepalli [quantph/0610153], we determine subsystem CSS code parameters, express codewords, and develop a Steane-type decoder using only data from the two underlying classical codes. Generalizing a result of Kovalev and Pryadko [Phys. Rev. A 88 012311 (2013)], we show that any subsystem stabilizer code can be "doubled" to yield a subsystem CSS code with twice the number of physical, logical, and gauge qudits and up to twice the code distance. This mapping preserves locality and is tighter than the Majorana-based mapping of Bravyi, Terhal, and Leemhuis [New J. Phys. 12 083039 (2010)]. Using Goursat's Lemma, we show that every subsystem stabilizer code can be constructed from two nested subsystem CSS codes satisfying certain constraints, and we characterize subsystem stabilizer codes based on the nested codes' properties.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

Category Correction Request

Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.

Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.

Log In to Submit

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #6451 #25311 Synthesis of Arbitrary Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.