Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Linear Circuit Synthesis using Weighted Steiner Trees

arXiv
Authors: Nir Gavrielov, Alexander Ivrii, Shelly Garion

Year

2024

Paper ID

64480

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

123

Citations

N/A

Abstract

CNOT circuits are a common building block of general quantum circuits. The problem of synthesizing and optimizing such circuits has received a lot of attention in the quantum computing literature. This problem is especially challenging for quantum devices with restricted connectivity, where two-qubit gates can only be placed between adjacent qubits. The state-of-the-art algorithms for optimizing the number of CNOT gates are heuristic algorithms that are based on Gaussian elimination and that use Steiner trees to connect between different subsets of qubits. In this article, we suggest considering weighted Steiner trees, and we present a simple low-cost heuristic to compute weights. The simulated evaluation shows that the suggested heuristic is almost always beneficial and reduces the number of CNOT gates by up to 10%.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • CNOT circuits are a common building block of general quantum circuits.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #64480

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.