Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Linear Circuit Synthesis using Weighted Steiner Trees
arXiv
Authors: Nir Gavrielov, Alexander Ivrii, Shelly Garion
Year
2024
Paper ID
64480
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
123
Citations
N/A
Abstract
CNOT circuits are a common building block of general quantum circuits. The problem of synthesizing and optimizing such circuits has received a lot of attention in the quantum computing literature. This problem is especially challenging for quantum devices with restricted connectivity, where two-qubit gates can only be placed between adjacent qubits. The state-of-the-art algorithms for optimizing the number of CNOT gates are heuristic algorithms that are based on Gaussian elimination and that use Steiner trees to connect between different subsets of qubits. In this article, we suggest considering weighted Steiner trees, and we present a simple low-cost heuristic to compute weights. The simulated evaluation shows that the suggested heuristic is almost always beneficial and reduces the number of CNOT gates by up to 10%.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- CNOT circuits are a common building block of general quantum circuits.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.