Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Dynamic Resource Allocation with Quantum Error Detection
arXiv
Authors: Quinn Langfitt, Alvin Gonzales, Joshua Gao, Ji Liu, Zain H. Saleem, Nikos Hardavellas, Kaitlin N. Smith
Year
2024
Paper ID
64390
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
177
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum processing units (QPUs) are highly heterogeneous in terms of physical qubit performance. To add even more complexity, drift in quantum noise landscapes has been well-documented. This makes resource allocation a challenging problem whenever a quantum program must be mapped to hardware. As a solution, we propose a novel resource allocation framework that applies Pauli checks. Pauli checks have demonstrated their efficacy at error mitigation in prior work, and in this paper, we highlight their potential to infer the noise characteristics of a quantum system. Circuits with embedded Pauli checks can be executed on different regions of qubits, and the syndrome data created by error-detecting Pauli checks can be leveraged to guide quantum program outcomes toward regions that produce higher-fidelity final distributions. Using noisy simulation and a real QPU testbed, we show that dynamic quantum resource allocation with Pauli checks can outperform state-of-art mapping techniques, such as those that are noise-aware. Further, when applied toward the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm, techniques guided by Pauli checks demonstrate the ability to increase circuit fidelity 11% on average, and up to 33%.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum processing units (QPUs) are highly heterogeneous in terms of physical qubit performance.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.