Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

A Feasible Design of Elementary Quantum Arithmetic Logic Units for Near-Term Quantum Computers

arXiv
Authors: Junxu Li

Year

2024

Paper ID

64335

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

123

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Quantum arithmetic logic units (QALUs) constitute a fundamental component of quantum computing. However, the implementation of QALUs on near-term quantum computers remains a substantial challenge, largely due to the limited connectivity of qubits. In this paper, we propose feasible QALUs, including quantum binary adders, subtractors, multipliers, and dividers, which are designed for near-term quantum computers with qubits arranged in two-dimensional arrays. Additionally, we introduce a feasible quantum arithmetic operation to compute the two's complement representation of signed integers. The proposed QALUs utilize only Pauli-X gates, CNOT gates, and Csqrt{X} (CSX) gates, and all two-qubit gates are operated between nearest neighbor qubits. Our work demonstrates a viable implementation of QALUs on near-term quantum computers, advancing towards scalable and resource-efficient quantum arithmetic operations.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Quantum arithmetic logic units (QALUs) constitute a fundamental component of quantum computing.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #64335

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.