Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Channel nonlocality under decoherence
arXiv
Authors: Albert Rico, Moisés Bermejo Morán, Fereshte Shahbeigi, Karol Życzkowski
Year
2024
Paper ID
64111
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
96
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The implementation of realistic quantum devices requires a solid understanding of the nonlocal resources present in quantum channels, and the effects of decoherence on them. Here we quantify nonlocality of bipartite quantum channels and identify its component resisting the effects of dephasing noise. Despite its classical nature, we demonstrate that the latter plays a relevant role in performing quantum protocols, such as state transformations and quantum coding for noisy communication. In the converse direction, we show that simulating certain stochastic processes with quantum channels undergoing decoherence has a communication advantage with respect to their classical simulation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The implementation of realistic quantum devices requires a solid understanding of the nonlocal resources present in quantum channels, and the effects of decoherence on them.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.