Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Benchmarking bosonic and fermionic dynamics
arXiv
Authors: Jadwiga Wilkens, Marios Ioannou, Ellen Derbyshire, Jens Eisert, Dominik Hangleiter, Ingo Roth, Jonas Haferkamp
Year
2024
Paper ID
64057
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
139
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Analog quantum simulation allows for assessing static and dynamical properties of strongly correlated quantum systems to high precision. To perform simulations outside the reach of classical computers, accurate and reliable implementations of the anticipated Hamiltonians are required. To achieve those, characterization and benchmarking tools are a necessity. For digital quantum devices, randomized benchmarking can provide a benchmark on the average quality of the implementation of a gate set. In this work, we introduce a versatile framework for randomized analog benchmarking of bosonic and fermionic quantum devices implementing particle number preserving dynamics. The scheme makes use of the restricted operations which are native to analog simulators and other continuous variable systems. Importantly, like randomized benchmarking, it is robust against state preparation and measurement errors. We discuss the scheme's efficiency, derive theoretical performance guarantees and showcase the protocol with numerical examples.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Analog quantum simulation allows for assessing static and dynamical properties of strongly correlated quantum systems to high precision.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.