Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Machine-learning certification of multipartite entanglement for noisy quantum hardware
arXiv
Authors: Andreas J. C. Fuchs, Eric Brunner, Jiheon Seong, Hyeokjea Kwon, Seungchan Seo, Joonwoo Bae, Andreas Buchleitner, Edoardo G. Carnio
Year
2024
Paper ID
63974
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
124
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Entanglement is a fundamental aspect of quantum physics, both conceptually and for its many applications. Classifying an arbitrary multipartite state as entangled or separable - a task referred to as the separability problem - poses a significant challenge, since a state can be entangled with respect to many different of its partitions. We develop a certification pipeline that feeds the statistics of random local measurements into a non-linear dimensionality reduction algorithm, to determine with respect to which partitions a given quantum state is entangled. After training a model on randomly generated quantum states, entangled in different partitions and of varying purity, we verify the accuracy of its predictions on simulated test data, and finally apply it to states prepared on IBM quantum computing hardware.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Entanglement is a fundamental aspect of quantum physics, both conceptually and for its many applications.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.