Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Cheating in quantum Rabin oblivious transfer using delayed measurements

arXiv
Authors: James T. Peat, Erika Andersson

Year

2024

Paper ID

63970

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

132

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Oblivious transfer has been the interest of study as it can be used as a building block for multiparty computation. There are many forms of oblivious transfer; we explore a variant known as Rabin oblivious transfer. Here the sender Alice has one bit, and the receiver Bob obtains this bit with a certain probability. The sender does not know whether the receiver obtained the bit or not. For a previously suggested protocol, we show a possible attack using a delayed measurement. This allows a cheating party to pass tests carried out by the other party, while gaining more information than if they would have been honest. We show how this attack allows perfect cheating, unless the protocol is modified, and suggest changes which lower the cheating probability for the examined cheating strategies.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Oblivious transfer has been the interest of study as it can be used as a building block for multiparty computation.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #63970 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.